MediaWiki to WordPress: Choose Your Shooting Mark

Read in 2 minutes

If you make up your mind to create your own web project – more probably that some plain and of little promise blog or website is not what you expect for. If you have attempted a task, surely you want to make it to the high standard. A popular website with top rankings and traffic, the favorite place for your site followers and for you to manage it – looks like a nice description of your future web project.

Now, in order to get this all-inclusive website, let’s look through the most optimal and suitable framework to turn your dream website into reality. Narrowing down the search of your future website building tool, let’s look through the MediaWiki to WordPress comparison.

What is WordPress and MediaWiki Target?

  • WordPress

Generally, while comparing MediaWiki to WordPress trends, they vary greatly. While comparing these two software, WordPress takes the lion’s share of the market – approximately 57% out of all CMS-built sites. It is considered to be the respectful tool among professionals and offers the great variety of web projects to perform – like blogs, websites, or even e-stores (with the extra plugins).

  • MediaWiki

While speaking about MediaWiki, its market share is just 0,2%. But its not because of poor features or limited abilities. You should know that MediaWiki allows creating wiki pages thus, it’s the utility that allows running extremely savvy websites, intranets and extended web projects.

What are the Major Shades of MediaWiki and WordPress Cores?

  • MediaWiki Functional Requirements and Abilities

Virtually, MediaWiki is a pretty complex and developer-oriented free open source wiki package. It requires the strong programming knowledge, and is designed to run on a large so-called “server farm”. Also, running your web project on Mediawiki comprises some modifications in the CMS code, thus, it’s recommended to find an expert who knows all the MediaWiki tricks, if you want to concentrate more on your website content management part rather than writing codes.

However, MediaWiki constantly provides its followers with the security updates and is capable to handle thousands of visitors at a time. But if you’d like to create something like Wikipedia, Mediawiki is what you are looking for. Also, its pages use wikitext format that makes publishing simple and does not require the knowledge of XHTML and CSS.

  • WordPress Core

WordPress boasts its built-in functionality that allows to optimize and manage a website with no additional functionality. Besides, it is capable to create websites together with the forum, blog, online store, etc. It’s available to manage them with the single dashboard.

WordPress doesn’t require any additional server conditions, however, this tool is more suitable for low traffic sites (it’s evaluated in comparison to Wikipedia). But it’s more engaging to manage and add new content. Just look through the diagram below done by

MediaWiki_to WordPress_comparison

So, in order to choose the right basis of your future website, initially, distinguish your web project focus area – whether it’s more informative and encyclopedia-oriented source or multifunctional web page with the blog, website, forum, etc.

In case you’d like to give a try to WordPress CMS, but currently, run a site on MediaWiki, there’s a tempting option – you may migrate your MediaWiki to WordPress in an automated way with CMS2CMS. It converts every bit of your site content to WordPress in a few moments with no extra installation. Devote a few minutes of your time to set up your free Demo Migration and perform your free of hassles MediaWiki migration – you’ll make sure it’s easier than you could imagine.

Try us free!

The following two tabs change content below.

Valentyna Tysiachna

Valia is a vivid CMS platforms observer, that’s why she found her dream job of marketer manager at CMS2CMS migration service. Keen English learner, music lover and passionate content writer, she enjoys constant improvement and is open to challenges.
comments powered by Disqus