Are Static HTML Websites Really a Thing of the Past?
Are Static HTML Websites Really a Thing of the Past?

Are Static HTML Websites Really a Thing of the Past?

Probably, once in a lifetime every website owner has stood at the edge of choosing between HTML static website and CMS solution. It seems that the process of finding the consensus decision between those two is like solving a complex differential equation – complicated, but as mathematicians have shown – quite possible.

The thing is that website owners often do not completely realize what HTML and CMS sites are all about, what main features they have, and what makes them different. Though the most dizzying question occurring here is particularly in what cases should we use one solution or another. So, let’s consider three basic points and figure out which way to go and are really static HTML websites a thing of past?… Or future?


In terms of ease of use, there is no shade of doubt that comprising a CMS site is thousands of times handier than to build a static HTML one. In fact, HTML website choice is not that difficult to make if you’ve got a programming background or any coding experience. Though, if there was no script-developing knowledge before in your practice, a more appropriate solution would definitely be CMS.

Want to make your site-building life even easier? Go on with a single 5 minute CMS installation and be ready to run an online project with a wide variety of plugins and themes. When constructing a website with CMS, a couple of easily implemented steps are all you need to have and proceed with the whole maintenance procedure.


On the step of defining the cost and the regular money investments for site htmlmaintenance with CMS or HTML, the matter of programming background flows out again. Be it even the most basic CMS site or a static HTML, having no tech experience you will need to reach out for external help. The thing here is that with a CMS, most probably, you’ll need that only once. With HTML, contrastingly, there are two roads opened wide before you – start expertise coding, or pay each and every single time when there would be something to change or rearrange with your web project. Decide from the very start how often and how considerably your site will need editing and changes. Once ended up with a decision – go on concluding with a price.


To keep up with new trends and changes emerging in the online world, site builders have to speed up their learning and meet the suitable requirements at a highly blistering pace. One of the things they need to know and to encounter is how exactly to develop and extend their sites. If compared to a static HTML website and one powered by a CMS – it turns to be even more than obvious which of the two be for sure a winner. Normally, features tending to consume plenty of time in a static site, take a minute to do with a CMS. It goes beyond the doubts that with the last option you are able to proceed dozens of operations easily and quickly. However, if to master the HTML scripting and some basic CSS – static sites would definitely be a far more flexible choice to function and go.

Bottom line

The points mentioned above are merely the basic elements to consider when you have to choose between CMS and a static HTML. We recommend to compare them on a use-case basis. Examine their strengths and weaknesses from the perspective of your project goals. Decide your budget, the scope of your site and, lastly, your skills and knowledge. Once you proceeded with all these, you be able to end up with the right decision.

If you’re an owner of a site built on an HTML and willing to test out the benefits of CMS solution – go on with our free trial online tool and be ready to make the best fitting decision.

The following two tabs change content below.

Valentyna Tysiachna

Valia is a vivid CMS platforms observer, that’s why she found her dream job of marketer manager at CMS2CMS migration service. Keen English learner, music lover and passionate content writer, she enjoys constant improvement and is open to challenges.


Avoid the pain of manual data migration